Intravenous (IV) fluids are essential in hospital settings for various purposes, including hydration, electrolyte replacement, and as vehicles for medication delivery. Two commonly used IV fluids are normal saline (NS) and lactated Ringer’s (LR) solution. Understanding their compositions, uses, costs, and comparative efficacy is crucial for healthcare providers to make informed decisions in patient care.
Normal saline, also known as 0.9% sodium chloride, is a crystalloid solution containing 154 mEq/L of sodium and 154 mEq/L of chloride. Its osmolarity of 308 mOsm/L makes it slightly hypertonic compared to blood plasma. NS is widely used for fluid resuscitation, blood loss replacement, and as a diluent for various medications. Its simplicity and versatility have made it a staple in many clinical settings.
Lactated Ringer’s solution, on the other hand, has a more complex composition that more closely resembles human plasma compared to normal saline. It contains 130 mEq/L of sodium, 109 mEq/L of chloride, 4 mEq/L of potassium, 3 mEq/L of calcium, and 28 mEq/L of lactate. With an osmolarity of 273 mOsm/L, LR is slightly hypotonic compared to blood plasma. The lactate in LR is metabolized to bicarbonate, providing a mild alkalinizing effect, which can be beneficial in certain clinical scenarios.
Comparing the cost of normal saline and lactated Ringer’s, LR is slightly more expensive. A 1-liter bag of NS typically costs just over $1, while LR costs approximately $1.25.
Several studies have compared the efficacy of NS and LR in various clinical situations. In a study involving patients with acute pancreatitis, LR was found to reduce systemic inflammation compared to NS. This suggests that LR may be preferable in conditions where reducing inflammation is a priority.
The SALT-ED trial provided insights into the use of balanced crystalloids (including lactated Ringer’s solution) versus normal saline in noncritically ill adults. The study found that balanced crystalloids resulted in a lower incidence of major adverse kidney events within 30 days compared to NS. This finding has led many clinicians to prefer balanced solutions like LR for fluid resuscitation.
In the context of hyperkalemia, a common concern has been the use of LR due to its potassium content. However, a subgroup analysis from the SALT-ED trial showed no significant difference in the development of severe hyperkalemia between patients receiving balanced crystalloids (including LR) and those receiving NS. This challenges the traditional notion that LR should be avoided in hyperkalemic patients.
The choice between normal saline and lactated Ringer’s solution often depends on the specific clinical scenario. NS remains the preferred solution for diluting blood products and in situations where a higher sodium concentration is desired. LR, with its more physiologic composition, may be advantageous in cases of metabolic acidosis, sepsis, and trauma resuscitation.
In conclusion, both NS and LR have important roles in fluid management. The trend in recent years has been towards increased use of balanced solutions like LR, particularly in situations
requiring large volume resuscitation. However, the choice of fluid should always be tailored to the individual patient’s needs, considering their underlying condition, electrolyte status, and acid-base balance. As research continues to evolve, clinicians should stay informed about the latest evidence to optimize fluid therapy in their practice.
References
1. Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia. 2017;72(S1):16-37. doi:10.1111/anae.13738
2. Self WH, Semler MW, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Noncritically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):819-828. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1711586
3. Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):829-839. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1711584
4. Zampieri FG, Azevedo LCP, Corrêa TD, et al. Study protocol for the Balanced Solution versus Saline in Intensive Care Study (BaSICS): a factorial randomised trial. Crit Care Resusc. 2017;19(2):175-182. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1796-9
5. Young P, Bailey M, Beasley R, et al. Effect of a Buffered Crystalloid Solution vs Saline on Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The SPLIT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314(16):1701-1710. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.12334